Philipp Hancke
c89e1d2ae7
Automatic update from web-platform-tests webrtc: remove incorrect SRTP cipher suite from WPT after downstream WebRTC was fixed. Bug: webrtc:518266748 Change-Id: I185acead0076736e53332bc397b485f1aa1e2d1b Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7936889 Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <philipp.hancke@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1647634} -- wpt-commits: 4c86e8c668fa42886384b0b9d0b6cf978f5bb15d wpt-pr: 60663
81 lines
2.7 KiB
HTML
81 lines
2.7 KiB
HTML
<!doctype html>
|
|
<meta charset=utf-8>
|
|
<title>RTCPeerConnection.prototype.createOffer</title>
|
|
<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
|
|
<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
|
|
<script src="../RTCPeerConnection-helper.js"></script>
|
|
<script>
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
// RFC 8827 section 6.5
|
|
//
|
|
// All Implementations MUST support DTLS 1.2 with the
|
|
// TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite and the P-256
|
|
// curve [FIPS186].
|
|
// ....... The DTLS-SRTP protection profile
|
|
// SRTP_AES128_CM_HMAC_SHA1_80 MUST be supported for SRTP.
|
|
// Implementations MUST favor cipher suites which support (Perfect
|
|
// Forward Secrecy) PFS over non-PFS cipher suites and SHOULD favor AEAD
|
|
// over non-AEAD cipher suites.
|
|
|
|
const acceptableTlsVersions = new Set([
|
|
'FEFD', // DTLS 1.2 - RFC 6437 section 4.1
|
|
'0304', // TLS 1.3 - RFC 8446 section 5.1
|
|
'FEFC', // DTLS 1.3 - RFC 9147 section 5.3
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const acceptableDtlsCiphersuites = new Set([
|
|
'TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256',
|
|
'TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256',
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const acceptableSrtpCiphersuites = new Set([
|
|
'SRTP_AES128_CM_HMAC_SHA1_80',
|
|
'SRTP_AEAD_AES_128_GCM',
|
|
'SRTP_AEAD_AES_256_GCM',
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
const acceptableValues = {
|
|
'tlsVersion': acceptableTlsVersions,
|
|
'dtlsCipher': acceptableDtlsCiphersuites,
|
|
'srtpCipher': acceptableSrtpCiphersuites,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
function verifyStat(name, transportStats) {
|
|
assert_not_equals(typeof transportStats, 'undefined');
|
|
assert_true(name in transportStats, 'Value present:');
|
|
assert_true(acceptableValues[name].has(transportStats[name]));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (const name of Object.keys(acceptableValues)) {
|
|
promise_test(async t => {
|
|
const pc1 = new RTCPeerConnection();
|
|
const pc2 = new RTCPeerConnection();
|
|
t.add_cleanup(() => pc1.close());
|
|
t.add_cleanup(() => pc2.close());
|
|
pc1.createDataChannel('foo');
|
|
exchangeIceCandidates(pc1, pc2);
|
|
await exchangeOfferAnswer(pc1, pc2);
|
|
await waitForState(pc1.sctp.transport, 'connected');
|
|
const statsReport = await pc1.getStats();
|
|
const transportStats = [...statsReport.values()].find(({type}) => type === 'transport');
|
|
verifyStat(name, transportStats);
|
|
}, name + ' is acceptable on data-only');
|
|
|
|
promise_test(async t => {
|
|
const pc1 = new RTCPeerConnection();
|
|
const pc2 = new RTCPeerConnection();
|
|
t.add_cleanup(() => pc1.close());
|
|
t.add_cleanup(() => pc2.close());
|
|
const transceiver = pc1.addTransceiver('video');
|
|
|
|
exchangeIceCandidates(pc1, pc2);
|
|
await exchangeOfferAnswer(pc1, pc2);
|
|
await waitForState(transceiver.sender.transport, 'connected');
|
|
const statsReport = await pc1.getStats();
|
|
const transportStats = [...statsReport.values()].find(({type}) => type === 'transport');
|
|
verifyStat(name, transportStats);
|
|
}, name + ' is acceptable on video-only');
|
|
}
|
|
</script>
|